AffectsAdds Chapter 44-06.1 to, amends and reenacts Sections 10-19.1-84, 44-05-01, 44-08-06, and 47-19-18 in, and repeals Chapter 44-06 and Sections 47-19-14.1, 47-19-14.2, 47-19-14.3, 47-19-14.4, 47-19-14.5, 47-19-14.6, 47-19-14.7, and 47-19-14.8 of the North Dakota Century Code.
AnalysisNorth Dakota becomes the first state to enact substantive provisions of the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts (RULONA). After a two-year drafting process, the RULONA was approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws on July 15, 2010.
The RULONA was undertaken for a number of reasons: first, the 1982 ULONA was long overdue for a revision; second, the scope of the ULONA was very narrow and NCCUSL wanted to broaden the scope of the Act to include ethical standards for Notaries, commissioning, and mandatory education and testing; and finally, with the advent of electronic records, provisions related to the use of electronic technologies to perform notarial acts were needed. Closely related was a concern that the near unanimous adoption of NCCUSL’s Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) throughout the U.S. was not perceived as providing the legal authorization for Notaries to perform electronic notarial acts. Just as NCCUSL undertook to draft the Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act (URPERA) because of the confusion about whether the UETA permitted county recorders to electronically record real property documents, so NCCUSL took on the task of revising the ULONA to dispel the same confusion with respect to Notaries.
House Bill 1136 does not enact the RULONA in its entirety but it does adopt a number of prominent provisions. First, Notaries may refuse to perform a notarial act if the Notary is not satisfied that the signer is competent to sign or has not signed the document voluntarily. Second, Notaries must complete a notarial certificate contemporaneously with the performance of the notarial act and sign a certificate after the notarial act has been completed. Third, effective August 1, 2013, in performing electronic notarial acts, North Dakota Notaries must use a technology that is “tamper-evident,” that is, the technology must be able to visibly show if a record has been changed after the Notary’s signature has been affixed to the electronic record. Fourth, HB 1136 enacts the very strong prohibitions against a Notary engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. Fifth, effective August 1, 2013, the Secretary of State must create and maintain an electronic database of Notaries, particularly those with the capability of performing electronic notarial acts. Sixth, HB 1136 enacts the provision permitting a document signer with a physical limitation to direct someone other than the Notary to sign the document for the disabled signer. Of course, many of these provisions first appeared in the Model Notary Acts of 1984, 2002 and 2010, predating the RULONA.
Nevertheless, the NNA has a few issues with House Bill 1136. First, the journal, education and examination provisions which were in the introduced version of the bill were removed in the House. Second, HB 1136 retains the provision allowing a Notary to provide an “assurance” – meaning a bond or instrument of functional equivalency, such as an irrevocable letter of credit. The idea of a letter of credit is a brand new and untested concept and the drafting committee inserted it at the request of the American Bankers Association. Third, although we recognize that many senior citizens do not have current identification documents, we believe it is an unwise policy to allow an expired identification card to be presented to a Notary. Fourth, we take minor exception to the replacement of the word “seal” with “official stamp,” since the word “seal” has a long history of use in statutes and the state and federal rules of evidence, and the word “seal” more adequately encompasses both a rubber stamp and metal embossing seal. Fifth, we believe the requirement to post a prescribed notice in every advertisement to inform the public that nonattorney Notaries cannot draft legal documents, provide legal advice and counsel on immigration matters goes too far. This provision should have been limited strictly to advertisements in a foreign language, because it is the immigrant community that that has been harmed by so-called “immigration consultants.” As it stands now, this advertising provision will unnecessarily increase the cost for Notaries to advertise their services.
House Bill 1136 repeals the former Uniform Recognition of Acknowledgments Act and former Chapter 44-06. However, many of the current Notary provisions in Chapter 44-06 were brought over into newly created Chapter 44-6.1.
The electronic notarization provisions and requirement for the Secretary of State to provide a database of commissioned Notaries is effective August 1, 2013.
Read House Bill 1136.